LOTG
HomeAttorney BiosPractice AreasNewsletterContact Us1

1
Business & Corporate
Employment Law
Securities
Immigration & Naturalization
Commercial & General Litigation
Collections
Land Use
Real Estate
Wills, Trusts & Estate Planning
Divorce & Family Issues
Municipal Court Defense


The Imapct of the "new" Palimony Statute Still Unknown

by SandyDurst 30. November 2010 05:34
As discussed in the recent posting by the New Jersey Law Journal, the true impact of the NJ Palimony statute remains to be decided. Retroactive application would be grossly inequitable and it is hoped that the Court proivdes guidance on this point. NEW PALIMONY STATUTE OF FRAUDS' RETROACTIVITY AT ISSUE ON APPEAL Against a backdrop of conflicting trial court rulings, a New Jersey appeals court is poised to decide whether the state's year-old statutory ban on oral palimony agreements is retroactive. On Dec. 13, the Appellate Division will hear arguments in Botis v. Estate of Kudrick, a dispute over a revision to the statute of frauds, N.J.S.A. 25:1-5(h), that requires an agreement by one person to provide support to another during or after a "non-marital personal relationship" be put in writing after both parties are advised by counsel. The law, signed by Gov. Jon Corzine last Jan. 18, stated that it "shall take effect immediately," but it is unclear whether that meant it applies only to agreements struck after that date or also to longstanding agreements that are sought to be enforced after that date. The difference is especially critical where the alleged promisor is dead.

Currently rated 1.5 by 12 people

  • Currently 1.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

Office closed on Wed., Sept. 29th between 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m.

by MOsborne 28. September 2010 06:43
Electrical work will be conducted in separate unit of our building that will necessitate, unfortunately, the shutting down of electrical power from 8:00 a.m. through 11:00 a.m. Although there will be a backup power generator on, we have no idea what exactly is going to be shut down and what will be operational since this has never occurred before. Your patience is appreciated and we will respond to all firm communications as quickly as possible. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Currently rated 1.6 by 7 people

  • Currently 1.571429/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

When will NJ's new Palimony Law become effective?

by SandyDurst 15. July 2010 23:13
PALIMONY LAW'S RETROACTIVITY RAISED ON APPEAL In the six months since the Legislature declared palimony agreements unenforceable unless put in writing, N.J. courts have come to opposite conclusions on whether or not the statute is retroactive. Now, lawyers in two of those cases are seeking guidance from above, asking for permission for interlocutory appeal of rulings declaring the statute only prospective in application. The law, N.J.S.A. 25:1-5(h), states that it "shall take effect immediately," but does that mean it applies only to agreements struck after the Jan. 18 effective date? Or does it apply to ongoing arrangements for support never committed to writing that are now sought to be enforced? If the Appellate Division agrees to hear either of the cases, it could resolve a problem of interpretation that could affect untold numbers of oral contracts between unmarried parties that until this year have been enforceable.

Currently rated 1.5 by 4 people

  • Currently 1.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

Court Clarifies permissible scope of "past acts' of domestic violence

by SandyDurst 25. May 2010 23:55
FAMILY LAW — DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 20-2-8004 T.J. v. G.G., App. Div. (per curiam) (7 pp.) Defendant appeals from a domestic violence final restraining order. The appellate panel finds that defendant raised valid issues regarding the fairness of the proceedings and the sufficiency of the evidence, and that it was "improper to base a finding of domestic violence upon acts or a course of conduct not even mentioned in the complaint." The panel reverses and remands for a new trial.

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

Sandy Durst, Esq. to host 3-part Divorce Seminar on May 19th, June 2nd and June 16th

by SandyDurst 20. April 2010 06:18
Even in a healthy economy, a divorce can become an overwhelming and emotional experience. Knowledge and answers to your questions will prepare and assist you in making the best decisions. Join Sandy Durst and accompanying professionals for an informative three-part lecture series covering the primary topics associatedwith a divorce. The dates and topics for each seminar are: May 19, 2010 on the Divorce Process, June 2, 2010 on Financial Issues of Divorce and June 16, 2010 on issues affecting the children. each seminar will begin at 7:00 p.m. Sandy Durst is a partner in the Princeton Law Firm of Lynch, Osborne, Theivakumar, Gilmore & Durst, where he heads the Family Law department for the firm. With more than 10 years of experience in family law, and with numerous awards and accomplishments, Mr. Durst is an authority and resource in all aspects of divorce and family law. The seminar series is free and open to the public and will be held at the offices of Lynch, Osborne, Theivakumar, Gilmore & Durst at 264 Nassau Street, Princeton, NJ. For additional information or to make a reservation, you can call (609) 921-7770 x5, email sdurst@lotgdlaw.com, or visit www.lotgdlaw.com. Pre-registration is required.

Currently rated 3.0 by 5 people

  • Currently 3/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

Our office is closed today for observance of Good Friday

by MOsborne 2. April 2010 00:31
Have a wonderful Easter weekend.

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

Our office will be closed on Friday, February 25, 2010 due to the weather.

by MOsborne 25. February 2010 01:11
[No text]

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

NJ Supreme Court upholds Domestic Violence Statute

by SandyDurst 18. February 2010 04:45
In a decision that signals how serioulsy the Court takes the issue of domestic violence, the New Jersey upheld the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act (N.J.S.A. 2C:25-17-35). The Act was challenged as being unconstitutional.  Additional details regrading the decision will be posted.

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

The Initial Consultation - meeting your attorney for the first time

by SandyDurst 9. February 2010 00:22

The Initial Consultation

By:      T. Sandberg Durst, Esq.

            Lynch, Osborne, Theivakumar, Gilmore & Durst, LLC

For many people, one of the most difficult parts of the divorce process can be the initial consultation.  Deciding to meet with an attorney can seem to be an intimidating event.  Furthermore, doing so may make real the fact that the marriage is irretrievably broken and that is, understandably, a painful threshold to cross.  Whether your first meeting is simply to gather additional information or a decisive step to begin the divorce process, there are steps that can be taken to make consultation as productive as possible.  The more information you as the client can make available and are willing to share with the attorney the better.  No two marriages are alike and the more insight you can provide, the better the attorney can assess your particular situation.

            You should plan on spending approximately one hour with the attorney for the initial consultation.  Information that the attorney will want may include:

                                    1.         The name of you and your spouse as well as the names and ages of any children;

                                    2.         The name of your or your spouse’s employer and salary information;

                                    3.         Your address and contact information such as phone number and e-mail address;

                                    4.         The name of your spouse’s attorney if known;

                                    5.         The date and location of the marriage;

                                    6.         Whether there have been any previous court proceedings between you and your spouse;

                                    7.         Whether or not you still reside together;

                                    8.         A list of assets and liabilities with approximate values;

                                    9.         Any unusual facts or circumstances of your marriage or family;

                                    10.       Whether or not there is a prenuptial agreement.

            Once this information has been provided the attorney will be able to provide some preliminary guidance on such issues as alimony, child support, child custody and equitable distribution.  Keep in mind that this initial assessment is only based on a preliminary review of the available information and may change as the case unfolds and additional information become available.

            In order to prepare the Complaint for Divorce, you and your attorney will need to decide upon which of the nine available grounds for divorce will be used.  Under current New Jersey law, there are nine reasons for seeking a divorce.  They are: (1) irreconcilable differences (2) Extreme Cruelty (3) Adultery (4) Eighteen Month Separation (5) Desertion (6) Habitual Drunkenness (7) Mental Illness (8) Imprisonment and (9) Deviant Sexual Conduct.

            Once the details of the Complaint for Divorce have been fleshed out, the discussion can turn to an explanation of the divorce process.

Currently rated 1.0 by 1 people

  • Currently 1/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

Appellate Division Expands LAD Liability to Include Business-Contract Relationships

by MOsborne 13. January 2010 08:47

An appeals court panel thecase J.T’s Tire Service, Inc., et al. v. United Rentals North America, Inc.,et al., A-2989-08T2, ruled today that laws barring sexual discriminationand harassment do not just apply to employer-employee relationships, but alsoto relationships between businesses that have a contract with each other.  The three-court panel unanimously overturned a lower court’s decision thatthe female owner of a tire distributor could not sue United Rentals North America,Inc. after one of their branch managers pulled the company's business from herwhen she rejected his sexual advances.  "Thequid pro quo sexual harassment alleged in the complaint, if legally permitted,would stand as a barrier to women's ability to do business on an equal footingwith men," the judges said.

 

The owner of J.T.'s TireService Inc., Eileen Tortorello, filed suit against United Rentals NorthAmerica Inc. and its Piscataway branch manager, Harold Hinkes, in January 2008.The suit alleged that Hinkes did not buy tires from Tortorello's firm after sherefused his sexual advances.  Thecomplaint charged United Rentals and Hinkes with discriminatory refusal to dobusiness, under the Law Against Discrimination (LAD).  Shortly after the complaint was filed, UnitedRentals filed a motion, seeking dismissal of the lawsuit on the grounds thatthe LAD only applied in employer-employee relationships, not between twobusinesses.  Superior Court Judge EdwardRyan, sitting in New Brunswick, agreed with United Rentals and dismissed thecomplaint.  Tortorello's attorney appealedRyan's decision, which was overturned by the appellate court's ruling.  Since the decision was unanimous, United Rentalsmust apply to the state Supreme Court for permission to appeal the ruling. Ifthis ruling is not overturned, it may significantly expand the contours of LADwell beyond the traditional employer-employee relationships.

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

Powered by BlogEngine.NET 1.4.0.0
Theme by Mads Kristensen

Recent comments

Comment RSS

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in  anyway.

© Copyright 2008
 

Lynch, Osborne, Theivakumar & Gilmore, LLC | 245C Nassau Street | P.O. Box 520 | Princeton, New Jersey 08542-0520 | (Tel.) (609) 921-7770 | (Fax.) (609) 921-7773